1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 342 S.C.
  5. 342 S.C. 409 (2000)
 

IN RE HUSKEY

No. 25194.

342 S.C. 409 (2000)

537 S.E.2d 276

In the Matter of Willard Vandy HUSKEY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided September 11, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry B. Richardson and Senior Assistant Attorney General James G. Bogle, Jr., both of Columbia, for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Willard Vandy Huskey, pro se.

PER CURIAM:

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an agreement under Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.1 In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to disbarment from the practice of law. We accept the agreement for disbarment. The facts in the agreement are as follows.

Client Files

Respondent worked at the Henson Law Firm (Firm) as an Equity Associate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases