BONVENTRE v. ROSE


271 A.D.2d 468 (2000)

706 N.Y.S.2d 905

VITO BONVENTRE et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE ROSE et al., Defendants, and DANIEL J. ROSE et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided April 10, 2000.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly denied those branches of the appellants' motion which were for summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as seeks to recover damages based on violations of Labor Law §§ 200 and 241 (6) insofar as asserted against them. A triable issue of fact exists as to whether the appellant Thomas Guarascio acted as the agent for the appellant Daniel J. Rose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases