1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 106 F.Supp.2d
  5. 106 F.Supp.2d 627 (2000)
 

A.K. STAMPING CO. v. INSTRUMENT SPECIALTIES CO.

No. Civ.A.98-5576(JAG).

106 F.Supp.2d 627 (2000)

A.K. STAMPING CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. INSTRUMENT SPECIALTIES CO., INC. and Indravadan Patel, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

Opinion Denying Reconsideration July 19, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carmine A. Iannaccone, James P. Flynn, Sanford J. Hodes, Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., Newark, NJ, for plaintiff A.K. Stamping Co., Inc.

Richard L. Plotkin, Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, Florham Park, NJ, Regis E. Slutter, George A. Hovanec, Jr., Harold R. Brown, Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, L.L.P., Alexandria, VA, for defendant Instrument Specialties Co., Inc.

Ronald L. Davison, Starr, Gern, Davison & Rubin, P.C., Roseland, NJ, for defendant Indravadan Patel.

OPINION

GREENAWAY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff A.K. Stamping Co., Inc.'s ("AKS") motion seeking a preliminary injunction, and the cross-motion of defendant Instrument Specialties Co., Inc. ("ISC") seeking summary judgment. AKS argues that ISC is infringing upon one of its patents and a preliminary injunction is necessary to halt that alleged infringement. ISC, in contrast...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases