Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The cross-examination of the plaintiff Daniel Bivona was relevant to his ability to perceive and remember events and, thus, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in allowing this testimony (see, Murphy v Estate of Vece,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.