GRIEVANCE ADM'R v. UNDERWOOD

Docket No. 113180, Calendar No. 10.

612 N.W.2d 116 (2000)

462 Mich. 188

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Attorney Grievance Commission, State of Michigan, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David L. UNDERWOOD, P-44754, Respondent-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided June 27, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Edick, Cynthia C. Bullington, and Richard L. Cunningham, Detroit, MI, for petitioner-appellant.

Dunnings & Frawley, P.C., by Stuart J. Dunnings, Jr., Lansing, MI, for respondent-appellee.

Moore, Vestrand & Pozehl, P.C., by Joan P. Vestrand, Southfield, MI, amicus curiae for State Bar Grievance Committee on Behalf of the State Bar of Michigan.


Opinion

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J.

This attorney discipline case requires us to decide whether respondent Underwood's delayed petition for review was timely under MCR 9.118(A)(3). That rule directs the Attorney Discipline Board (ADB) to treat the one-year limitation period in MCR 7.205(F) as a guideline, rather than as an absolute deadline. Because we hold that under the circumstances of this case, the ADB did not abuse its discretion in considering respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases