MEJIA v. CITY OF NEW YORK


272 A.D.2d 453 (2000)

708 N.Y.S.2d 308

MOISES MEJIA et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents, and 953 MANHATTAN FOOD CORPORATION, Doing Business as C-TOWN SUPERMARKET, et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided May 15, 2000.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendant Tina Angeline for summary judgment, as she failed to meet her initial burden of producing evidence sufficient to demonstrate her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). The court also properly denied the motion of the defendant 953 Manhattan Food Corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases