1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 276 A.D.2d
  5. 276 A.D.2d 447 (2000)
 

MILLER v. AMERADA HESS CORP.

276 A.D.2d 447 (2000)

715 N.Y.S.2d 392

CREIGHTON E. MILLER, as Administrator of the Estate of MOSES ANDREWS, Deceased, Appellant, v. AMERADA HESS CORP. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided October 31, 2000.

Summary judgment was properly granted, since here, as in Miller v Akronchem Corp. (276 A.D.2d 447 [decided herewith]), there was no eyewitness testimony placing the decedent in a specific area at a specific time, or placing an identifiable defendant's product in the same area at the same time (cf., Dollas v Grace & Co., 225 A.D.2d 319, 320), and also, as in Miller, the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases