1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 116 F.Supp.2d
  5. 116 F.Supp.2d 604 (2000)
 

McNEIL CONSUMER BRANDS, INC. v. U.S. DENTEK CORP.

No. Civ.A.00-815.

116 F.Supp.2d 604 (2000)

MCNEIL CONSUMER BRANDS, INC., et al. v. U.S. DENTEK CORPORATION

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

September 22, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Kelly Tillery, Leonard, Tillery and Sciolla, Philadelphia, PA, Thomas C. Morrison, Patterson, Belknap, Webb and Tyler, New York City, Gregory C. Dicarlo, Leonard, Tillery & Sciolla, Philadelphia, PA, Marc S. Reiner, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, New York City, for McNeil Consumer Brands, Inc. and McNeil-PPC, Inc., Plaintiffs.

R. Mark Armbrust, Ruthrauff & Armbrust, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, John K. Stewart, Paul Raynor Keating, Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Brien F. McMahon, White McMahon & Potter, Santa Rosa, CA, for U.S. Dentek Corporation, Defendant.

MEMORANDUM

BARTLE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs McNeil Consumer Brands, Inc. and McNeil-PPC, Inc. (collectively known as "McNeil") are the owners of five registered trademarks for the pain reliever "Tylenol."1 They have sued U.S. DenTek Corporation ("DenTek"), which uses the name "Tempanol" for its analgesic products. McNeil claims trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1), as well as trademark dilution under both the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases