BROADHURST v. CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH ELECT.

No. 25191.

342 S.C. 373 (2000)

537 S.E.2d 543

Rachel BROADHURST, Appellant/Respondent, v. CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH ELECTION COMMISSION, Wilson Cain, and Michael Chestnut, Respondents, of whom Wilson Cain is Respondent/Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided August 28, 2000.

Rehearing Denied September 20, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan D. Clemmons, of McCracken, Barnett, Richardson & Clemmons, of Myrtle Beach, and Charles L.A. Terreni, of Columbia, for appellant/respondent.

Gene McCain Connell, Jr., of Kelaher, Connell & Connor, P.A., of Surfside Beach, for respondent/appellant.

John M. Leiter, of Leiter & Snook, of Myrtle Beach, for respondent Michael Chestnut.

Michael W. Battle, of Battle & Vaught, of Conway, for respondent City of Myrtle Beach Election Commission.


BURNETT, Justice:

This is an appeal from an election protest. Respondent City of Myrtle Beach Election Commission (Election Commission) denied the protest. The circuit court reversed, granting the protest and ordering a new election on a limited basis. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Appellant/Respondent Broadhurst (Broadhurst), Respondent/Appellant Cain (Cain), and Respondent Chestnut...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases