1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 277 A.D.2d
  5. 277 A.D.2d 438 (2000)
 

PARENTE v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

277 A.D.2d 438 (2000)

715 N.Y.S.2d 907

NICK PARENTE et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. D & F MASONS, INC., Third-Party Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided November 27, 2000.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is well settled that "where a party disobeys a court order, and by his or her conduct frustrates the disclosure scheme provided by the CPLR, dismissal of a pleading is within the broad discretion of the trial court" (Castrignano v Flynn, 255 A.D.2d 352, 353; see, CPLR 3126 [3]; Ranfort v Peak Tours, 250 A.D.2d 747

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases