Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court providently exercised its discretion in sua sponte dismissing a prospective juror since the juror's responses to the court's own questions revealed that he was unqualified to serve (see, People v Zamora,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SMITH
268 A.D.2d 447 (2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 624
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHESTER SMITH, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 10, 2000.
Decided January 10, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.