1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 89 Ohio
  5. 89 Ohio St.3d 622 (2000)
 

CASA 94, L.P. v. FRANKLIN CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 99-1312.

89 Ohio St.3d 622 (2000)

CASA 94, L.P., APPELLEE, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL.; APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 13, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wayne E. Petkovic, for appellee.

Ronald J. O'Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, Matthew H. Chafin and Paul M. Stickel, Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellants Franklin County Board of Revision and Franklin County Auditor.

Teaford, Rich, Crites & Wesp, Jeffrey A. Rich and James R. Gorry, for appellant Board of Education of the Westerville City School District.

Per Curiam.

The appellants contend that R.C. 5715.19(G) precludes a property owner from testifying about the terms and conditions of a sale before the BTA if (1) the owner did not testify or otherwise present admissible evidence concerning the sale to the board of revision and (2) the owner does not show good cause for the failure to do so. We agree.

R.C. 5715.19(G) provides:

"A complainant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases