1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 1 P.3d
  5. 1 P.3d 706 (2000)
 

CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COM'N v. MYERS

Nos. CV-00-0054-SA, CV-00-0055-SA.

1 P.3d 706 (2000)

196 Ariz. 516

CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. Hon. Robert D. MYERS, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent, VotePac, a registered Arizona political committee, David Armstead, Edward J. Cirrillo, Rick Lavis, and Betty Rockwell, Real Parties in Interest. Arizonans For Clean Elections, Petitioner/Defendant-Intervenor, and Citizens Clean Elections Commission, Defendant-Intervenor, v. Hon. Robert D. Myers, Judge of Maricopa County Superior Court, Respondent, and Betsy Bayless, et al., Respondents/Defendants, and VotePac, a registered Arizona political committee, David Armstead, Edward J. Cirrillo, Rick Lavis, and Betty Rockwell, Respondents/Plaintiffs, Real Parties in Interest.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

June 16, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet A. Napolitano, Attorney General By W. Scott Bales, Joseph A. Kanefield and Dennis K. Burke, Assistant Attorneys General, Phoenix, Attorneys for Citizens Clean Elections Commission.

Meyers, Taber, Meyers By Lisa T. Hauser, J. Tyrell Taber, Phoenix, Attorneys for VotePac, et al.

Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest By Timothy M. Hogan, Jennifer B. Anderson and Tina A. Calos, Phoenix, Attorneys for Arizonans for Clean Elections.

Janet A. Napolitano, Attorney General By W. Scott Bales, Joseph A. Kanefield, Dennis K. Burke, and Charles S. Pierson, Assistant Attorneys General, Phoenix, Attorneys for Citizens Clean Elections Commission and Betsey Bayless, Secretary of State.

Meyers, Taber, Meyers By Lisa T. Hauser, J. Tyrell Taber, Phoenix, Attorneys for VotePac, et al.

OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

¶ 1 These are consolidated petitions for special action brought by the Citizens Clean Elections Commission and the Arizonans for Clean Elections against VotePac and others seeking expedited review of an order of the Superior Court of Arizona in Maricopa County holding that the Citizens Clean Elections Act, A.R.S. §§ 16-940 to -961, violates the Arizona Constitution and is thus invalid. Given the imminence of the year...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases