OKANOGAN HIGHLANDS ALLIANCE v. WILLIAMS

Nos. 99-35537, 99-35538.

236 F.3d 468 (2000)

OKANOGAN HIGHLANDS ALLIANCE; Washington Environmental Council; Colville Indian Environmental Protection Alliance; Kettle Range Conservation Group, Plaintiffs, and Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Plaintiff-intervenor-Appellant, v. Robert WILLIAMS, Regional Forester; Richard A. Ferraro, Deputy Regional Forester; United States Forest Service; Sam Gehr, Supervisor of the Okanogan National Forest, Defendants-Appellees, and Battle Mountain Gold Company, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee. Okanogan Highlands Alliance; Washington Environmental Council; Colville Indian Environmental Protection Alliance; Kettle Range Conservation Group, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Plaintiff-intervenor, v. Robert Williams, Regional Forester; Richard A. Ferraro, Deputy Regional Forester; United States Forest Service; Sam Gehr, Supervisor of the Okanogan National Forest, Defendants-Appellees, and Battle Mountain Gold Company, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed December 29, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Flynn, Western Mining Action Project, Boulder, Colorado, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Stephen H. Suagee, Office of the Reservation Attorney, Nespelem, Washington, for the plaintiff-intervenor-appellant.

Ethan G. Shenkman, Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for the defendants-appellees.

Michael J. Malmquist and Jim Butler, Parsons Behle & Latimer, Salt Lake City, Utah, for the defendant-intervenor-appellee.

Before: CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, PAMELA ANN RYMER, and SUSAN P. GRABER, Circuit Judges.


Argued and Submitted November 13, 2000 — Portland, Oregon.

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Okanogan Highlands Alliance (OHA) and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (Colville) challenge the adequacy of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Record of Decision (ROD) prepared by the United States Forest Service (Forest Service).1 Plaintiffs make three arguments: (1) The district court and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases