THOMPSON v. MERCURY CAS. CO.

No. E025722.

100 Cal.Rptr.2d 596 (2000)

84 Cal.App.4th 90

Catherine THOMPSON et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-Defendants and Respondents, v. MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Appellant; Joshua Dominguez, a minor, etc., Defendant, Cross-Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

Rehearing Denied November 3, 2000.

Review Denied January 10, 2001.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hager & Dowling, John V. Hager, Thomas J. Dowling, Joy L. Lim, Santa Barbara; Horvitz & Levy, Barry R. Levy, Encino, and H. Thomas Watson, Beverly Hills, for Defendant, Cross-Complainant, and Appellant.

Law Offices of William D. Shapiro and William D. Shapiro, San Bernardino, for Plaintiffs, Cross-Defendants, and Respondents.

Mazursky, Schwartz & Angelo, Christopher E. Angelo and Debra J. Wegman, Los Angeles, for Defendant, Cross-Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

GAUT, J.

1. Introduction

Mercury Casualty Company's (Mercury) automobile liability insurance policy contains a provision, "Condition 23," that limits coverage to the statutorily required minimums for persons using the car with the named insured's permission. In this declaratory relief action, the trial court found "Condition 23" inconspicuous as a matter of law. On appeal, we agree with the trial court and affirm.

2.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases