Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress identification testimony and statements he made to law enforcement officials. The defendant failed to establish that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the apartment where he was arrested and therefore lacked standing to challenge the warrantless entry into the premises (see, People v Wesley,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
