1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 611 N.W.2d
  5. 611 N.W.2d 71 (2000)
 

RUMNEY v. RUMNEY

No. C9-99-1838.

611 N.W.2d 71 (2000)

In re the Marriage of Diane Renee RUMNEY, petitioner, Respondent, v. Mark Wayne RUMNEY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 6, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bonnie L. Kleman, Kleman Law Firm, Willmar, for respondent.

Rodney C. Hanson, Anderson, Larson, Hanson & Saunders, P.L.L.P., Willmar, for appellant.

Considered and decided by SHUMAKER, Presiding Judge, CRIPPEN, Judge, and DAVIES, Judge.

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant Mark Rumney challenges the amount of child support awarded in a dissolution action. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in not applying a Hortis/Valento adjustment in child support to reflect the fact that the children spend 39% of their time with him. We affirm, concluding that the Hortis/Valento formula is to be applied as a guidelines application only when the parties have joint physical custody or when, although...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases