1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 11 P.3d
  5. 11 P.3d 671 (2000)
 

DAYTON PRAIRIE WATER ASSN. v. YAMHILL CTY.

(LUBA No. 99-123; CA A110515)

11 P.3d 671 (2000)

170 Or. App. 6

DAYTON PRAIRIE WATER ASSOCIATION and Timothy Kreder, Petitioners, v. YAMHILL COUNTY, City of Dayton, and City of Lafayette, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 27, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven M. Claussen, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for the petitioners.

Pamela J. Beery, Portland, argued the cause for respondents City of Dayton and City of Lafayette. With her on the brief was Christopher A. Gilmore.

No appearance for respondent Yamhill County.

Before LINDER, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge.

DEITS, C.J.

Petitioners appealed to LUBA from Yamhill County's decision approving the application of the respondent cities (respondents) to install intake wells and other facilities for a water system in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone. LUBA concluded that the county had not made adequate findings to support its decision that the reservoir and treatment facility for the project needed to be located on EFU land and remanded that portion of the decision to the county...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases