1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 273 A.D.2d
  5. 273 A.D.2d 408 (2000)
 

PEOPLE v. HERMONSTYNE

273 A.D.2d 408 (2000)

711 N.Y.S.2d 335

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. COURTNEY HERMONSTYNE, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 19, 2000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's argument that he was prejudiced because of allegedly improper summation remarks by the prosecutor is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Heide, 84 N.Y.2d 943; People v Elliot, 151 A.D.2d 498). In any event, the majority of the prosecutor's statements were either in response...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases