SHERWOOD v. ODOT

(C950628CV; CA A98350)

11 P.3d 664 (2000)

170 Or. App. 66

David SHERWOOD, Noralee Sherwood and David Sherwood, as Guardian Ad Litem of Nathan D. Sherwood, a Minor, Appellants, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 27, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ben Shafton argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Morse & Bratt.

Jas. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON and WOLLHEIM, Judges.


HASELTON, J.

Plaintiffs Noralee, David, and Nathan Sherwood1 appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), in a tort action arising out of an automobile accident. Plaintiffs assign error to the trial court's grant of ODOT's motion for summary judgment and argue, specifically, that the court erred in holding that: (1) Noralee's negligence claim was barred by both issue preclusion and claim preclusion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases