MUZQUIZ v. CITY OF EMERYVILLE

No. A078223.

94 Cal.Rptr.2d 579 (2000)

79 Cal.App.4th 1106

M. MUZQUIZ, as Executor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF EMERYVILLE, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

April 14, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horowitz & Rubinoff, Martin M. Horowitz, Stephanie Rubinoff, Oakland, and Bryce C. Anderson, Clayton, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Michael G. Biddle, Assistant City Attorney, Emeryville, Shartsis, Friese & Ginsburg, Joel Zeldin, Robert Charles Ward, San Francisco, for Defendant and Respondent.


McGUINESS, P.J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent City of Emeryville (the City) following a court trial on a complaint alleging employment discrimination on the basis of age under Government Code section 12900 et seq.1 Appellant Frances Muzquiz contends the trial court committed prejudicial error, both by adopting an erroneous burden of proof and by considering inadmissible evidence at trial. We conclude it is the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases