JAYDOR CORP. v. MILLBURN TP.


18 N.J. Tax 655 (2000)

JAYDOR CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MILLBURN TOWNSHIP, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Decided April 14, 2000


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven R. Irwin argued the cause for appellant (Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum, attorneys; Peter L. Davidson, on the brief).

John R. Lloyd argued the cause for respondent (Rosenblum Wolf & Lloyd, attorneys; Mr. Lloyd, on the brief).

Before Judges CARCHMAN, LEFELT and LINTNER.


PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves the interpretation of N.J.S.A. 54:1-35a to -35c (Chapter 123) and N.J.S.A. 54:51A-6, and its application to the valuation of a single parcel in a multi-parcel economic unit, where the economic unit spans two municipalities situated in two separate counties. Chapter 123 requires a comparison of two ratios: (1) a property's assessed valuation to its true value, and (2) the taxing district's "average ratio" of assessed to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases