1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 7 P.3d
  5. 7 P.3d 665 (2000)
 

MOHR v. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES

(97-04178; CA A103884)

7 P.3d 665 (2000)

168 Or. App. 579

In the Matter of the Compensation of Billy M. Mohr, Claimant. Billy M. MOHR, Petitioner, v. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 28, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald A. Martin, Bend, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Francis & Martin.

William J. Blitz, Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

ARMSTRONG, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board in which the Board held that claimant was not entitled to compensation for the medical services that he received after he experienced pain in his arm while at work. He assigns error to the Board's determination that he did not show a sufficient connection between his workplace injury and the medical treatment to entitle him to compensation. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases