1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 220 F.3d
  5. 220 F.3d 449 (2000)
 

ANDERSON v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.

No. 99-5800.

220 F.3d 449 (2000)

Marilyn ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY; The Procter & Gamble Disability Benefit Plan, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: July 12, 2000

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Justin S. Gilbert (briefed), The Gilbert Firm, Jackson, Tennessee, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Janis Wild Kesser (briefed), Baker, Donelson, Bearman & Caldwell, Stephen D. Wakefield, Kullman, Inman, Bee, Downing & Banta, Memphis, Tennessee, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: RYAN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges; and DUGGAN, District Judge.

OPINION

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

This is an ERISA case in which the Appellant, Marilyn Anderson, a beneficiary of the Appellee's Disability Benefit Plan, seeks to recover for the cost of legal assistance during her administrative appeal to the Plan Trustees. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court's order denying Anderson's request for fees.

I

Procter & Gamble (P & G) hired Anderson on November 28, 1988, when...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases