The action was properly dismissed on the ground that the "Productivity Compensation Plan" that plaintiff claims defendants breached clearly provides that, as an incentive to "retain and recruit key Account Executives", payment of any "award" is to be deferred for five years and forfeited if, as occurred here, the employee was no longer employed by defendants at the end of such five-year period (see, Hall v United Parcel Serv.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
D'AMATO v. MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER DISCOVER & CO.
268 A.D.2d 392 (2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 431
JOHN D'AMATO, Appellant, v. MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER DISCOVER & CO. et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 27, 2000.
Decided January 27, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
