PEACOCK v. SHINN

No. 442P00.

546 S.E.2d 110 (2000)

353 N.C. 267

Edwin B. PEACOCK, Jr., Plaintiff, for the benefit of the taxpayers of the City of Charlotte v. George SHINN, individually and George Hill Sports of Florida, Inc., Charlotte Hornets NBA Limited Partnership, Shinn Enterprises, Incorporated; and City of Charlotte; and, Auditorium-Coliseum-Convention Center Authority of the City of Charlotte.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 20, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin B. Peacock, Jr., Pro Se.

Roy H. Michaux, Jr., John H. Carmichael, Charlotte, for Shinn, Shinn Sports of Fla, Horn., for George Shinn, George Shinn Sports of Florida, Inc., Charlotte Hornets NBA Limited Partnership and Shinn Enterprises Inc.

Robert E. Hagemann, Assistant City Attorney, for City of Charlotte.


Prior report: 139 N.C. App. 487, 533 S.E.2d 842.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals filed by the Plaintiff Pro Se in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Respondents, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases