The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility and identification.
The court's Sandoval ruling, which permitted cross-examination about two prior drug-related convictions without any reference to the underlying facts of those convictions, balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see, People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
