HAUCK v. NEW YORK HILTON


276 A.D.2d 378 (2000)

714 N.Y.S.2d 71

MARGUERITE HAUCK, Respondent, v. NEW YORK HILTON et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided October 19, 2000.


The motion court properly permitted plaintiff to serve an amended complaint adding Kinney System, Inc. as a defendant, since the amended complaint's cause of action against Kinney relates back to the original, timely asserted cause of action against defendant New York Hilton (see, CPLR 203 [b]; Buran v Coupal, 87 N.Y.2d 173, 177). Kinney does not dispute that the claim against it arises out of the same incident underlying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases