CITY OF PAINESVILLE BLDG. DEPT. v. DWORKEN & BERNSTEIN CO., L.P.A.

No. 99-1769.

89 Ohio St.3d 564 (2000)

CITY OF PAINESVILLE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, APPELLANT, v. DWORKEN & BERNSTEIN CO., L.P.A., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 6, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward C. Powers, Painesville City Prosecutor, for appellant.

Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., and Shawn W. Maestle, for appellee.


MOYER, C. J.

We have examined the law relevant to the issue of the constitutionality of Section 1135.02(d). We conclude that a narrowly drawn municipal ordinance imposing reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on the display of temporary signs, including political yard signs posted on private property, could constitutionally be enacted. Section 1135.02(d), however, is not such an ordinance, and is unconstitutional when applied to prohibit the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases