Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp. (hereinafter Natan-Ya), failed to appear at the trial of a cross claim asserted against it by the defendant Robert S. Digiose, d/b/a Progressive Mason (hereinafter Digiose). Accordingly, the Supreme Court did not err in dispensing with the requirement of notice to Natan-Ya of the application by Digiose for leave to enter judgment against it upon its default (see, CPLR 3215...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.