The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's determinations concerning credibility. There was ample evidence from which the jury could have reasonably inferred defendant's intent to defraud the customers of the "boiler-room" operation he directed and to permanently deprive them of their investment money, as well as ample evidence establishing the element of reliance by...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.