STATE v. CLARK

(CR7-1882; CA A103376)

14 P.3d 626 (2000)

171 Or. App. 1

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Ronald Dean CLARK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 15, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark G. Reinecke, Bend, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Bryant, Lovlien & Jarvis, P.C.

Dan Casey, Houston, TX, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Christina M. Hutchins, Assistant Attorney General.

EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and BREWER, Judges.


EDMONDS, P.J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants, ORS 813.010(1)(b), assigning error to the trial court's rulings on several discovery and evidentiary issues. We affirm.

Defendant's first, second, and third assignments of error involve the arresting officer's destruction of a videotape of the arrest and the officer's testimony relating to that videotape. Before trial, defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases