DOYLE v. KUCH

No. C5-99-1951.

611 N.W.2d 28 (2000)

Rosemary DOYLE, Appellant, v. Edward V. KUCH, D.M.D., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 30, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Logan N. Foreman, III, and Tamara M. Haas, Minneapolis, for appellant.

William H. Hart, Katherine A. McBride, Barbara A. Zurek, Meagher & Geer, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by ANDERSON, Presiding Judge, SCHUMACHER, Judge, and PETERSON, Judge.


OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge

Appellant challenges the district court's grant of a Minn. R. Civ. P. 12.02(e) motion to dismiss her dental malpractice claim against respondent as barred by the statute of limitations. Because we are required to draw all inferences in favor of appellant's complaint, which alleges that negligence occurred within two years of the date she commenced suit, the statute of limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases