The parties formed a partnership for the purpose of acquiring certain mortgages and, by the terms of their partnership agreement, each partner was to receive a share of the proceeds from the disposition of the mortgages proportionate to the partner's interest in the partnership. Defendants, in opposing plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, failed to adduce proof in evidentiary form sufficient to raise an issue of fact with respect
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
EIGHTEEN HOLDING CORP. v. DRIZIN
268 A.D.2d 371 (2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 427
EIGHTEEN HOLDING CORP., Respondent, v. SHOLOM DRIZIN et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 25, 2000.
Decided January 25, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.