1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 98 F.Supp.2d
  5. 98 F.Supp.2d 538 (2000)
 

NEOMAGIC CORP. v. TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.

No. CIV. A. 98-699-RRM.

98 F.Supp.2d 538 (2000)

NEOMAGIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

May 8, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Horwitz, Joanne Ceballos, William J. Dorgan, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE, R.V. Lupo, Jack Q. Lever, Jr., Donna M. Tanguay, Brian E. Ferguson, Raymond A. Jacobsen, Jr., Stephen K. Shahida, McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, DC, Steven A. Maddox, McDermott, Will & Emery, Menlo Park, CA, for plaintiff.

Donald F. Parsons, Jr.,Mary B. Graham, Lisa K.W. Crossland, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE, James Pooley, Ian N. Feinberg, Barry N. Young, Elizabeth Day, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for defendant.

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This is a patent case. Plaintiff NeoMagic Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Santa Clara, California. NeoMagic is the owner of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,650,955 (the '955 patent) and 5,703,806 (the '806 patent) which are directed to a graphics controller used in notebook computers. Defendant Trident Microsystems, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Mountain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases