SYMMES TWP. BD. OF TRUSTEES v. SMYTH

No. 98-2479.

87 Ohio St.3d 549 (2000)

SYMMES TOWNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES, APPELLANT, v. SMYTH; AT&T WIRELESS PCS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 19, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert P. Malloy, Symmes Township Law Director; Wood & Lamping, L.L.P., and W. Kelly Lundrigan, for appellant.

Keating, Muething & Klekamp, P.L.L., Douglas L. Hensley and Dwight A. Packard II, for appellee Henry W. Schneider.

Barrett & Weber, C. Francis Barrett and M. Michele Fleming, for appellees AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc., and SBA, Inc.

Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue and Randall A. Cole, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Nextel Communications, Inc.


COOK, J.

As a general rule, Ohio law provides that townships have no power under the zoning laws to regulate the location, erection, or construction of any buildings or structures of any public utility. R.C. 519.211(A). There is a limited exception to this rule that applies to certain telecommunications towers that are to be located "in an area zoned for residential use." R.C. 519.211(B)(1)(c). Symmes Township...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases