Defendant husband's principal appellate contention is that the trial court erred when it deemed some $19.5 million in assets, alleged by defendant to be his separate property, part of the marital estate and subject to equitable distribution. The law, however, favors the inclusion of property within the marital estate (compare, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [c] and [d]; see, Burns v Burns,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LEROY v. LEROY
274 A.D.2d 362 (2000)
712 N.Y.S.2d 33
KAY LEROY, Respondent-Appellant, v. WARNER LEROY, Appellant-Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 27, 2000.
Decided July 27, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
