Appellants building owner and general contractor argue that the motion court's finding that third-party defendant used the freight elevators, not the stairways, to remove debris, and therefore could not have discarded the pipe over which plaintiff fell in a stairwell, necessarily requires a finding that appellants did not have notice of that pipe. This argument incorrectly assumes that the pipe in question could have been discarded only by third-party defendant, and overlooks...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
