The court properly dismissed the complaint based on plaintiff's failure to establish that defendants had transacted business within the State, subjecting them to jurisdiction under CPLR 302 (a) (1). Contrary to plaintiff's argument, sending faxes and making phone calls to this State are not, without more, activities tantamount to "transacting business" within the meaning of the aforecited long-arm statute. Nor was plaintiff entitled to additional discovery on the jurisdictional...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
