1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 102 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 102 Cal.Rptr.2d 523 (2000)
 

DEPUTY SHERIFFS' ASS'N v. SACRAMENTO COUNTY

No. C031927.

102 Cal.Rptr.2d 523 (2000)

85 Cal.App.4th 960

SACRAMENTO county deputy SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

Review Denied March 14, 2001.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mastagni, Holstedt & Chiurazzi, Richard J. Chiurazzi, Sacramento, and Charles H. Briggs III, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Robert A. Ryan, Jr., County Counsel, Michele Bach, Supervising Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

SCOTLAND, P.J.

At the primary election on June 2, 1998, the voters of Sacramento County approved Measure D and Measure E, both of which dealt with the arbitration of employment disputes between the County of Sacramento and nonsupervisory law enforcement representatives. Measure D passed by 58 percent of the vote, while Measure E passed by 53 percent of the vote.

The difference between the initiatives is that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases