Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
After the defendant was indicted for burglary in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 140.25 [2]) and related crimes, he moved, inter alia, to suppress identification testimony. The hearing court denied the motion, but did not issue findings of fact or conclusions of law. Under this Court's power to make determinations of fact and law (see, CPL 470.15; People v Moore,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.