1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 95 F.Supp.2d
  5. 95 F.Supp.2d 528 (2000)
 

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. LUCENTSUCKS.COM

No. CIV. A. 99-1916-A.

95 F.Supp.2d 528 (2000)

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. LUCENTSUCKS.COM, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

May 3, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Newbury, Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newburg, Hilliard & Geraldson, Chicago, IL, Roy G. Decker, Jr., Stauffer, Mannix, Rommel, Decker & Dulany, LLC, McLean, VA, for Plaintiff.

John S. Fogel, Los Angeles, CA, James W. Pravel, Pravel Intellectual Property Law, P.C., Alexandria, VA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRINKEMA, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Motion of Defendant lucentsucks.com's [sic] to Dismiss the Complaint, in which defendant argues that plaintiff's failure to comply with the requirements of the recently enacted AntiCybersquatting Consumer Protection Act mandates dismissal of the complaint. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Lucent Technologies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases