HUDSON v. CONDON

No. 18715-2-III.

6 P.3d 615 (2000)

101 Wash.App. 866

Phillip M. HUDSON, D.D.S. and Jan Hudson, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Donald F. CONDON, M.D. and Elizabeth Condon, husband and wife, and the marital community thereof, Respondents and Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Seven.

August 10, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Kulisch, Randall & Danskin, Spokane, for Appellants.

Erika Balazs, Lukins & Annis, Spokane, for Respondents.


SCHULTHEIS, J.

Phillip Hudson's claims against former partner Donald Condon for breaches of fiduciary duty, the lease and the partnership agreement and for reformation of the lease were dismissed on summary judgment. On appeal Dr. Hudson contends the trial court erred in ruling that the relevant statutes of limitations barred all his causes of action. We affirm.

FACTS

In September 1982 Dr. Hudson and Dr. Condon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases