1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 611 N.W.2d
  5. 611 N.W.2d 7 (2000)
 

BECKER v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. C6-99-288.

611 N.W.2d 7 (2000)

Carol BECKER, et al., petitioners, Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 25, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Dehen, New Brighton, for appellants.

Ken D. Schueler, Dunlap and Seeger, P.A., Rochester, Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Paul D. Peterson, Woodbury, for amicus curiae Minnesota Trial Lawyers Association.

Paul A. Banker, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, Minneapolis, for amicus curiae Robert J. Hauer, Jr. and Theodore J. Smetak.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This case addresses the question of whether an employee injured while occupying her employer's insured vehicle can seek excess uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage from her personal automobile insurance policy under Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 3a(5) (1998). Carol Becker, a truck driver, was injured in a motor vehicle accident during the course and scope of her employment while driving a semi-truck owned by her employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases