1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 15 P.3d
  5. 15 P.3d 602 (2000)
 

PONDER v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT.

(98-AB-1382, 98-AB-1266, 98-AB-1377, 98-AB-1381, 98-AB-1375, 98-AB-1376, 98-AB-1378; CA A103346 (Control), A103347, A103348, A193349, A103350, A103351, A103352)

15 P.3d 602 (2000)

171 Or. App. 435

Diane PONDER, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Garlington Center, Respondents. Janet Bardossi, Petitioner, v. Employment Department and Garlington Center, Respondents. Robin Hochtritt, Petitioner, v. Employment Department and Garlington Center, Respondents. Tim Foulke, Petitioner, v. Employment Department and Garlington Center, Respondents. David Hanson, Petitioner, v. Employment Department and Garlington Center, Respondents. Diane Bader, Petitioner, v. Employment Department and Garlington Center, Respondents. Barbara Hanna, Petitioner, v. Employment Department and Garlington Center, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 13, 2000.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeremy V. Sarant argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Sandra A. Hansberger, Emily K. Morris, Certified Law Student, Portland, and Lewis and Clark Legal Clinic.

David Farris Coursen, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Employment Department. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

No appearance by respondent Garlington Center.

Before De MUNIZ, Presiding Judge, and HASELTON and WOLLHEIM, Judges.

WOLLHEIM, J.

At the times relevant to this petition, the Garlington Center was a nonprofit organization working under contract with Multnomah County to provide out-patient mental health services to chronically and severely mentally ill clients in Northeast Portland. The vast majority of Garlington's clients have been diagnosed with schizophrenia. Others have bipolar disorder or organic brain disease. Some patients were referred by the Psychiatric Security Review Board...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases