ORTIZ v. SFDS DEVELOPMENT


274 A.D.2d 341 (2000)

712 N.Y.S.2d 94

HARRY ORTIZ, Appellant, v. SFDS DEVELOPMENT et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. SFDS DEVELOPMENT et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CATSPAW CONSTRUCTION CORP., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided July 20, 2000.


Defendants and third-party plaintiffs SFDS Development (SFDS) and San Francisco Houses, Inc. (San Francisco) own, maintain and operate the building designated as 210 East 104th Street, New York, New York (the premises). Plaintiff, a construction worker, was employed by third-party defendant Catspaw Construction Corp. (Catspaw), which was a general contractor engaged by SFDS and San Francisco to perform certain demolition and rehabilitation at the premises.

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases