1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 276 A.D.2d
  5. 276 A.D.2d 335 (2000)
 

LIDDLE & ROBINSON v. SHOEMAKER

276 A.D.2d 335 (2000)

714 N.Y.S.2d 46

LIDDLE & ROBINSON et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. PAUL T. SHOEMAKER, Defendant, and GREENFIELD STEIN & SENIOR, L. L. P., et al., Appellants-Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. LIDDLE & ROBINSON et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided October 17, 2000.

Although the motion court, in this dispute between various attorneys over legal fees, properly sustained the third, fourth, fifth and seventh causes of action in the amended complaint, alleging unjust enrichment, money had and received, conversion and aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty, it erred when it dismissed the first, sixth, eighth and ninth claims for, respectively, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases