Plaintiff's obligation under the offering plan to repair and maintain the portion of the roof to which she has a right of exclusive use does not involve an obligation to pay for the same portion of the cost of a total roof replacement. The replacement of the roof, as opposed to the repair and maintenance of plaintiff's section, is a major improvement that inures to the benefit of all of the shareholders (cf., Matter of SIN, Inc. v
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PECKOLICK v. 135 WEST 17TH STREET TENANT'S CORPORATION
268 A.D.2d 339 (2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 421
JOAN PECKOLICK, Respondent, v. 135 WEST 17TH STREET TENANT'S CORPORATION, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 20, 2000.
Decided January 20, 2000.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.