Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that reversible error occurred because of the prosecutor's conduct in attempting to obtain an in-court identification from one of the complainants. We disagree. The witness merely testified that the defendant "look[ed] like" the perpetrator. In any event, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt, including the lineup and in-court identifications by a second complainant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
