Petitioners' argument that a writ of prohibition is warranted because they are not employers within the meaning of Executive Law § 292 (5) and the complainant is not an employee within the meaning of Executive Law § 292 (6) was properly rejected. Petitioners' failure to exhaust administrative remedies bars this proceeding (see, Matter of Tessy Plastics Corp. v State Div. of Human Rights,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.